Castleton WI Scrapbook, 2008, Volume 1, page 8

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

E) Mn ntvm omm i Sm - f { : fx * <# e s s y *L m oi td | yC OA PA c f ty © 1 4 :, t - ie e a R ; l a ; I P ; / i e Pag sAE U g 1Stances tor new | mre es T F - f $ P e * * Promvanmnpanoc 4 l .. ‘ m Stie heviprich fl‘j h ietva : .,N_.,_fl'_:‘ | school concern parents wecyrs| ms 4| uow (| â€" . ‘ it ' n 1 a o n~. 0 TT (oy w s By Jack Evans Â¥2 and a sharp slope probably preclude using 1 2 1 ‘ t C ckh orpe ex2s5nkâ€" that site, she suggested. J in esys Le fep. 21) 08 j hal Cramahe Township parents support the The meeting was also told that with most C HAZ Mc d t nj se on handiwith + Phoro y Bos Owen concept of a new school, but they also . Of the land in the area designated as prime It‘s now open officially. Dignitaries and s ? Wr_?"e o oi 5}" ea residents for the official worry about increased longâ€"distance busing . agriculture, a suitable "green area‘" site to | apening of Mutton Bridge on February 15. “l’m C taBe esley Owen, Ruth Chapman, |. â€" \ for elementary aged pupils. build part way between the two and get Germaine James, Gramahe Director of DeveGo%m?‘n e”cky Bonisteel, Cramahe Chiet| Those were the main thoughts expressed. abproval for resoning would be difficult. Administrative Officer Christie Alexand.er,l e ewell engineer Wayne Patterson, by about 25 parents to the large Castleton. Meanwhile, the present Castleton Northumberlandâ€"Quinte West MPP Lou Rinal di, Cramahe Director of Public Works Barry and South Cramahe RPublic Schools Pupil â€" School, with a site of more than nine acres R Thrasher, Northumberlandâ€"Quinte West Rick Norlock, Cramahe Deputy Mayor Jim Williams Accommodation Review Committee at a is adequate. Ms. Summersides has placed Gramahe Mayor Mare Coombs. Absent from the photo but at the bridge BeryliMution and | public FEeeting in the South Cramahe _ the possible closing of the two schools at the Dawq Mutton. } School Feb.20. top of the agenda for the next meeting at Nas f f The committee includes parent and â€" Castleton Public School on Monday, March j resident members from both schools plus 3 at 6:30 p.m, She stressed at the February y Kawarthaâ€"Pine Ridge District School Board â€" 20 meeting that this is a onceâ€"inâ€"aâ€"lifetime officials, led by Sherry Summersides, â€" Chance to build anew school in this area. . / Agalen oooA associate director of education. One parent said she lives in the extreme 0 g 3 c g o t Ms. Summersides reviewed that the southeast corner of Crâ€"ai'nahe/il‘gsit would g og :___xg ? 1 sfi s present committee of about 20 members, is â€" be much closer for her three bo f({eso to 385®% 00 W fa thiae . i the second attempt to resolve the local Brighton or Spring Valley. She and several 3izcss 0o C [ . school issues. An earlier recommendation Other parents expressed the hope that 3g7988 j l j 4 from the board to consolidate the two 8¢hool boundaries could be redrawn so 8 2o 2s3 O : s > Pm § schools and send some students into a new, Dalx;enlt: could sent their children to closer % 5§ 5 §3 x 7 ! larger j ‘Municipality of Sschools. . . U Oe hy a 8g9 70 f ; 2 tss Sine # Brigghtosrflxln?:sl sltr(l)uttlis é\ggosedpbyl r?xos T Ms. Summersides said the board has a câ€"[,’-,!cg 5 U§_§: O re B \ BC 9 § parents in the areas involved. â€" policy of a maximum oneâ€"hour bus ride to â€" â€" |S§o08§52 O i Py She added that parents preferred a rural schools and all pupils }nvolv_ed,would easily _ 15@ > 8 8 3 2z o l school setting to sending their children to fit within that maximum Fegardless of as gg S % > [ â€" ie o( oi more urban areas like Brighton or Where the school might be located. Do 38 29 25 Cee % Ma Golborne. She also affirmed that recent _ Repairs to either or both the present f garkeG~ = h _ $ u. Hews reports about consolidating all rural SCho0ls were also ruled out as options i £3585 02 0 h s s 2 o. Cramahe pupils at Brighton were in ecror, â€" Decause of the way the provincial funding 8598 3 => P _ . 0 ts ; 4 apparently (based. on the earlier Offer is worded. F 3382 & Te . . â€" 1. a recommendation. Ms. Summersides stressed that the board Ss5sis m w9 i > g She said the new proposal is a window of Continues to rely on the final decision from ; tc32i(CcZ O 50s Pss 0 s t o (» opportunity to take advantage of capital the committee, and opportunities for more a258g9° 1J suy C n to funding av'a%able from the ministry of ibbut and sugeestions will continue with o% 28 2 J 13 uU c o education to build a new school and to bunld | meetings set for Castleton Public Sehqot on Sase y â€" hh oo _ â€".. onl one of reasonable size would require Monday, March 3 at 6.30 P.M. and_-‘South D m & 95 â€"= R . Aâ€"â€"a ue 43 i hagtle is joining the two school bodies into one: She Cramahe again on Thursday, April 10 at é © 12250 .. 2 ul & § denied that Castleton has already been 6:30 p.m.. She said the public may also k\ c8sg09 9 [ N6 DE TD m P decided as the site. attend the meeting of the board, probably in a §$gg § 5 . W o will â€" R The much smaller acreage at the present. June, when the committe® S final report S §5 § 82 >g j h 5 South Cramahe coupled with hazard lands will be presented. : 4 Agw & i 3 & J @ ’flfl&é” S â€" 77. _L._â€"oâ€"omâ€"â€"mommmmmmcmmmommemmmmmommmume o mommmmenncmntiil 8_§ 5""'0“2'.-<KEJD F30 y_;.v"lfu" \Roe :q | . Weshes |s ie Cenle s9g88 &

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy